CO129-459 - Individuals - 1919 — Page 82

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Cord p.137

Cord 138.

22.

Appellant was entitled to a trial by jury and that the Ordinance was ultra vires. On the 9th November another firm of solicitors were retained for the Appellant and wrote to the Colonial Secretary repeating the contention that the Deportation Ordinance was invalid and asking for an assurance that the Appellant would not be deported until he had an opportunity of raising this contention before the Courts.

23.

The Colonial Secretary by letter of the 22nd November gave the assurance requested. A copy of the warrant was further furnished by the Colonial Secretary and the Solicitor for the Appellant were informed that a copy of the charges against the Appellant could be supplied to the Appellant on application to the Respondent Mr. Hallifax, the Colonial Secretary declined to supply the copies of the other documents asked for.

A copy of the charges against the Appellant and of his statement were subsequently supplied by the Respondent Mr. Hallifax.

On the 14th December 1917 the Appellant's Solicitors wrote to the Colonial Secretary asking that:-

(1) Copies of any documents used or to be used against the Appellant might be supplied to them, and that he might be given inspection of the originals in company with the Solicitor and experts.

Edit History

2026-06-14 06:02:46 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

80Cord p.137Cord 138.Cord 138.22.Appellant was entitled to a trial by jury and that the Ordinance was ultra vires. On the 9th November another firm of solicitors were retained for the Appellant and wrote to the Colonial Secretary repeating the contention that the Deportation Ordinance was invalid and asking for an assurance that the Appellant would not be deported until he had an opportunity of raising this contention before the Courts.23.The Colonial Secretary by letter of the 22nd November gave the assurance requested. A copy of the warrant was further furnished by the Colonial Secretary and the Solicitor for the Appellant were informed that a copy of the charges against the Appellant could be supplied to the Appellant on application to the Respondent Mr. Hallifax, the Colonial Secretary declined to supply the copies of the other documents asked for.A copy of the charges against the Appellant and of his statement were subsequently supplied by the Respondent Mr. Hallifax.On the 14th December 1917 the Appellant's Solicitors wrote to the Colonial Secretary asking that:-(1) Copies of any documents used or to be used against the Appellant might be supplied to them, and that he might be given inspection of the originals in company with the Solicitor and experts.

Baseline (Original)

80cord p.137cord 138.cord 138.22.Appellant was entitled to a trial by try and that the Ordinance was ultra vires. On the 9th November another firm of solicitors were retained for the Appellant and wrote to the Colonial Secretary repeating the contention that the Deportation Ordinance was invalid and asking for an assurance that the Appellmt would not be deported until he had an opportunity of raising this contention before the Ocurts.23.The Colonial Secretary by letter of the 22nd November gave the assurance requested. A copy of the warrant was further furnished by the Colonial Secretary and the Solicitor for the Appellant were informed that a copy of the charges against the Appellant could be supplied to the Appellant on application to the Respondent Mr. Hallifax, the Colonial Secretary deolined to supply the copies of the other docu-A copy of the charges against the Appellant and of his statement were subsequently suppliedmenta asked for· by the Respondent Mr. Hallifax.On the 14th December 1917 the Appellamb's Solicitors wrote to the Colonial Secretary asking that:-(1) Copies of any documents used or to be used against The Appellant might be supplied to them, and that he might be given inspection of the originals in compy with the Solicitor and experts.

2026-06-14 06:02:46 · Baseline

View content

cord p.137

cord

138.

cord

138.

22.

Appellant was entitled to a trial by try and that the

Ordinance was ultra vires. On the 9th November another firm

of solicitors were retained for the Appellant and wrote to

the Colonial Secretary repeating the contention that the

Deportation Ordinance was invalid and asking for an assurance

that the Appellmt would not be deported until he had an

opportunity of raising this contention before the Ocurts.

23.

The Colonial Secretary by letter of the 22nd November

gave the assurance requested. A copy of the warrant was

further furnished by the Colonial Secretary and the Solicitor

for the Appellant were informed that a copy of the charges

against the Appellant could be supplied to the Appellant

on application to the Respondent Mr. Hallifax, the Colonial

Secretary deolined to supply the copies of the other docu-

A copy of the charges against the

Appellant and of his statement were subsequently supplied

menta asked for

by the Respondent Mr. Hallifax.

On the 14th December 1917 the Appellamb's Solicitors

wrote to the Colonial Secretary asking that:-

(1) Copies of any documents used or to be used against

The Appellant might be supplied to them, and that he might

be given inspection of the originals in compy with the

Solicitor and experts.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.